Brand names are another way of economizing on scarce knowledge.
Brand names are not guarantees. But they do reduce the range of uncertainty. If a hotel
sign says Hyatt Regency, chances are you will not have to worry about whether the bed
sheets in your room were changed since the last person slept there.
Like everything else in the economy, brand names have both benefits and costs. A hotel
with a Hyatt Regency sign out front is likely to charge you more for the same size and
quality of room, and accompanying service, than you would pay for the same things in
some locally—run independent hotel if you knew where to look.
Both Kodak and Fuji film have to be better than they would have to be if boxes simply
said “film,” without any reference to the manufacturer.
McDonald’s not only has to meet the standards set by the government, it has to meet the
standards set by the competition of Wendy’s and Burger King. If Campbell’s soup were
identified on the label only as “soup” (or “Tomato Soup,” “clam chowder,” etc), the
pressures on all canned soup producers to maintain both safety and quality would be less.
One of the reasons for the great success of McDonald’s in Moscow—the largest in the
world, with lines of people waiting to get into it—is that it was being compared to the
previous band quality of service in Soviet restaurants, not to Wendy’s or burger King.
Inventory is a substitute for knowledge. Since you don’t always know just how much inventory you are actually going to need and since inventory costs money, a business enterprise must try to limit how much inventory it has on hand. Those businesses, which have the greatest amount of knowledge and come closest to the optimal size of inventory, will have their profit prospects enhanced. Just as prices in general affect the allocation of resources from one place to another at a given time, so returns on investment affect the allocation of resources from one time period to another. A high rate of return provides incentives for people to save and invest more than they would at a lower rate of return. – A higher rate of return encourages people to consume less in the present so that they may consume more in the future. It allocates resources over time. The present value of an asset is in fact nothing more than its anticipated future returns, added up and discounted for the fac...
Comments
Post a Comment