Inventory is a substitute for knowledge. Since you don’t always know just how much
inventory you are actually going to need and since inventory costs money, a business
enterprise must try to limit how much inventory it has on hand.
Those businesses, which have the greatest amount of knowledge and come closest to the
optimal size of inventory, will have their profit prospects enhanced.
Just as prices in general affect the allocation of resources from one place to another at a
given time, so returns on investment affect the allocation of resources from one time
period to another. A high rate of return provides incentives for people to save and invest
more than they would at a lower rate of return. – A higher rate of return encourages
people to consume less in the present so that they may consume more in the future. It
allocates resources over time.
The present value of an asset is in fact nothing more than its anticipated future returns,
added up and discounted for the fact that they are delayed.
Conversely, if the city announces that it is going to begin building a sewage treatment
plant next year, on a piece of land next to your home, the value of your home will decline
immediately, before the adjoining land has been touched.
The present value of an asset reflects its futures benefits or detriments, so that anything,
which is expected to enhance or reduce those benefits or detriments will immediately
affect the price at which the asset can be sold today.
It makes sense for a 90 year old man to begin planting fruit trees that will take 20 years
before they reach their maturity, because his land will immediately be worth more as a
result of those trees. He can sell the land six months later and go live in the Bahamas if
he wishes. Part of the value of his wealth today consists of the value of food that has not
yet been grown – and which will be eaten by children who have not yet been born.
Genuine plunder of one nation or people by another has been all too common throughout human history. During the era before the First World War, when Germany had colonies in Africa, only 4 of its 22 enterprises with cocoa plantations there paid dividends, as did only 8 of 58 rubber plantations and only 3 out of 49 diamond mining companies. At the height of the British Empire in the early twentieth century, the British invested more in the United States than in all of Asia and Africa put together. Quite simply, there was more wealth to be made from rich countries than from poor countries. For similar reasons, throughout most of the twentieth century the United States invested more in Canada than in Asia and Africa put together. Only the rise of prosperous Asian industrial nations in the latter part of the twentieth century attracted more American investors in that part of the world. Perhaps the strongest evidence against the economic significance of colonies in the modern world is tha
Comments
Post a Comment