A popular fallacy that has become part of the tradition of anti-trust law is Predatory
Pricing. This where a big company that is out to eliminate its smaller competitors and take over their share of the market will lower its prices to a level that dooms the
competitor to unsustainable losses and forces it out of business.
A remarkable thing about this theory is that those who advocate it seldom provide
concrete examples of when it actually happened.
A company that sustains losses by selling below cost to drive out a competitor is
following a very risky strategy.
Even if our would-be predator manages somehow to overcome these problems, it is by no
means clear that eliminating existing competitors will mean eliminating competition.
Even when a rival firm has been forced into bankruptcy, its physical equipment and the
skills of the people who once made it viable do not vanish into thin air. A new
entrepreneur can come along and acquire both.
Bankruptcy can eliminate particular owners and managers, but it does not eliminate
competition in the form of new people, who may either take over an existing bankrupt
enterprise or start their own new business from scratch in the same industry.
Inventory is a substitute for knowledge. Since you don’t always know just how much inventory you are actually going to need and since inventory costs money, a business enterprise must try to limit how much inventory it has on hand. Those businesses, which have the greatest amount of knowledge and come closest to the optimal size of inventory, will have their profit prospects enhanced. Just as prices in general affect the allocation of resources from one place to another at a given time, so returns on investment affect the allocation of resources from one time period to another. A high rate of return provides incentives for people to save and invest more than they would at a lower rate of return. – A higher rate of return encourages people to consume less in the present so that they may consume more in the future. It allocates resources over time. The present value of an asset is in fact nothing more than its anticipated future returns, added up and discounted for the fac...
Comments
Post a Comment