Production costs are reduced when the fixed overhead costs can be spread out over a
large volume of output, adding little to the cost of each individual item. Scheduling also
affects production costs. When a high-volume retailer signs a contract for a large order
from a given manufacturer, that manufacturer can then schedule the work evenly
throughout the year. This avoids the additional costs that go with ups and downs in the
orders that come in unpredictably from the market, leaving the manufacturer’s workforce
idle during some weeks.
The fact that profits are contingent upon efficiency in producing what your customers
want, at a price that customers are willing to pay – and that losses are an ever present
threat if a business fails to provide that – explains much of the economic prosperity found
in economics that operate under free market competition. Profits as a realized end-result
are crucial to the individual business, but it is the Prospect of Profits – and the threat of
losses – that is crucial to the functioning of the economy as a whole.
Efficiency is the difference between having the necessities, comforts and amenities of
high-income countries and suffering the hunger and deprivations too often found in
poorer countries.
Genuine plunder of one nation or people by another has been all too common throughout human history. During the era before the First World War, when Germany had colonies in Africa, only 4 of its 22 enterprises with cocoa plantations there paid dividends, as did only 8 of 58 rubber plantations and only 3 out of 49 diamond mining companies. At the height of the British Empire in the early twentieth century, the British invested more in the United States than in all of Asia and Africa put together. Quite simply, there was more wealth to be made from rich countries than from poor countries. For similar reasons, throughout most of the twentieth century the United States invested more in Canada than in Asia and Africa put together. Only the rise of prosperous Asian industrial nations in the latter part of the twentieth century attracted more American investors in that part of the world. Perhaps the strongest evidence against the economic significance of colonies in the modern world is tha
Comments
Post a Comment