Skip to main content

Purchasing Power

Money that is saved does not vanish into thin air. It is lent out by banks and other financial institutions, being spent by different people for different purposes, but still remaining just as much a part of purchasing power as if it had never been saved. According to Say’s Law— supply creates its own demand. What a group of French economists known as Physiocrats showed in the late eighteenth century was that the production of goods and services automatically generates the purchasing power needed to buy those goods and services. When the economy creates another hundred million dollars worth of output, that is also another hundred million dollars worth of wealth that can be used to buy this or other output. Production is ultimately bought with other production, using money as a convenience to facilitate the transactions. During the Great Depression of the 1930s, for example, there was a massive increase of unemployment, along with business losses for the economy as a whole. The greatly reduced money supply of 1932 was incapable of buying the amount of output that had been produced during the boom years that ended in 1929. More precisely, the 1932 money supply was incapable of buying the 1929 level of output at 1929 prices. Prices began declining as a result of unsold goods, but prices did not fall fast enough or far enough to restore immediately the full production needed to create a full employment. Major malfunctions of the monetary system, including both massive bank failures and counterproductive policies by the Federal Reserve Board, as well as restrictive tariffs that disrupted international trade, and amateurish tinkering with the economy by both the Hoover and Roosevelt administrations, turned a problem catastrophe. John Maynard Keynes argued that government spending could put more money back into circulation and restore the economy to full employment faster than by waiting for prices to fall into balance with the reduced amount of money in circulation. But Keynes never claimed that the economy had just produced too much. President Herbert Hoover and then Franklin D. Roosevelt both tried to keep wage rates from falling, as a means of maintaining the purchasing power of workers, as well as for humanitarian reasons. But there was no way to keep employing the same number of workers as before, at the same wage rates as before, when the money supply was onethird smaller. Prices had to come down in the economy as a whole if everything was to be purchased with a smaller money supply. Some economists, including Nobel Prize winner Milton Friedman, have argued that it was precisely government policies that kept the economy from recovering as quickly as it had before, when left alone.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Imperialism

Genuine plunder of one nation or people by another has been all too common throughout human history. During the era before the First World War, when Germany had colonies in Africa, only 4 of its 22 enterprises with cocoa plantations there paid dividends, as did only 8 of 58 rubber plantations and only 3 out of 49 diamond mining companies. At the height of the British Empire in the early twentieth century, the British invested more in the United States than in all of Asia and Africa put together. Quite simply, there was more wealth to be made from rich countries than from poor countries. For similar reasons, throughout most of the twentieth century the United States invested more in Canada than in Asia and Africa put together. Only the rise of prosperous Asian industrial nations in the latter part of the twentieth century attracted more American investors in that part of the world. Perhaps the strongest evidence against the economic significance of colonies in the modern world is tha

Inventories Definition

Inventory is a substitute for knowledge. Since you don’t always know just how much inventory you are actually going to need and since inventory costs money, a business enterprise must try to limit how much inventory it has on hand. Those businesses, which have the greatest amount of knowledge and come closest to the optimal size of inventory, will have their profit prospects enhanced. Just as prices in general affect the allocation of resources from one place to another at a given time, so returns on investment affect the allocation of resources from one time period to another. A high rate of return provides incentives for people to save and invest more than they would at a lower rate of return. – A higher rate of return encourages people to consume less in the present so that they may consume more in the future. It allocates resources over time. The present value of an asset is in fact nothing more than its anticipated future returns, added up and discounted for the fac

Winners & Losers

Whatever the merits or demerits of various political proposal, what must be kept in mind when evaluating them is that the good fortunes and misfortunes of different sectors of the economy may be closely related as cause and effect - and that preventing bad effects may prevent good effects. It was not accidental that Smith Corona was losing millions of dollars on its typewriters while Dell was making millions on its computers. It was not accidental that Safeway surged to the top of the grocery business while A&P fell from its peak to virtual oblivion. The efficient allocation of scarce resources, which have alternative uses, means that some must lose their ability to use those resources in order that others can gain the ability to use them Typewriters were no longer what the public wanted after they had the option to achieve the same end result and more with computers. Scarcity implies that resources must be taken from some places, in order to go to other places.